This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged students.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy for 2024–2027 and how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
| School Overview | |
|---|---|
| School name | Tunbridge Wells Grammar School for Boys |
| Number of students in school | 1557 in Years 7–11 |
| Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible students | 6.1% |
| Academic year(s) covered by our pupil premium strategy plan | 2024–2027 |
| Published date |
|
| Review date | 18/11/2026 |
| Statement authorised by | Amanda Simpson (Headteacher) |
| Pupil premium lead | Ian Marris (Deputy Headteacher) |
| Governor/Trustee lead | Keith Ditcham |
| Funding Overview | |
|---|---|
| Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £98,530 |
| Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £0 |
| Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years | £0 |
| Total budget for this academic year | £98,530 |
We believe that all students, irrespective of their background or the challenges they face, make good progress and achieve high attainment across the curriculum.
High-quality first teaching is at the heart of our approach, with a focus on areas in which disadvantaged students require the most support. This is proven to have the greatest impact on closing the disadvantage attainment gap and at the same time will benefit the non-disadvantaged students in our school.
Our support and interventions this year and within our three-year strategy are planned around three key areas: teaching, targeted academic and well-being support and wider strategies in line with the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) guidance. As a school we are research driven in the support we put in place both through our own research and experience and that of the EEF, which helps guide us in our decisions around where to fund support and interventions. We keep abreast of national reports on disadvantage to inform our strategy (Annual Report 2025: Disadvantage - Education Policy Institute).
Our approach will be responsive to common challenges and individual needs, rooted in robust diagnostic assessment, across pastoral and curriculum areas, not assumptions about the impact of disadvantage. We will:
In summary, our mission is to create an aspirational, high achievement culture for all, to:
| Challenges | |
|---|---|
| This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged students. | |
| Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
| 1 | Closing the gap: ensuring that the progress made at the end of Key Stage 4 and Key Stage 5 is in line with the whole school cohort for all of our disadvantaged students. |
| 2 | Emotional barriers: ensuring that disadvantaged students are provided with support and services to enable them to deal with the challenges that affect their emotional well-being and consequently impact their learning. |
| 3 | Access to co-curricular opportunities: ensuring that students are routinely accessing the co-curricular opportunities on offer to deepen their learning and cultural capital. |
| 4 | Access to IT and curriculum materials: ensuring that students have access to curriculum materials and IT facilities for independent study and home learning. |
| 5 | Attendance: ensuring that the attendance of disadvantaged students is line with the whole school target of 96%. |
| Intended Outcomes | |
|---|---|
| This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved. | |
| Intended outcome | Success criteria |
| Knowledge and learning gaps are closed for all disadvantaged students so that they achieve in line with their peers. | Gaps are addressed in individual subjects as part of quality first teaching and evident as part of the school’s use of the 7KF, our pedagogical approach. Targeted subject-led interventions are used to provide additional support to disadvantaged students at subject and year level. Disadvantaged students are encouraged to regularly attend KS4 ‘study hall’. Disadvantaged students access online platforms for independent study. Data is collected and analysed at each assessment point and analysed by the SLT member responsible for Pupil Premium. |
| Disadvantaged students access emotional well-being support. | Disadvantaged students receive targeted support from the range of services available in school to support their well-being, confidence and study skills. All disadvantaged students have regular 1:1 pastoral support meetings. Qualitative and quantitative data on disadvantaged students accessing emotional well-being support is collated at individual and cohort level. Well-being support overseen by a Senior Mental Health lead in school. Tracking is logged on individual student progress by the SLT member responsible for Pupil Premium. |
| Increased opportunities to engage in broader cultural activities | Disadvantaged students access educational visits and other co-curricular opportunities. Access to these activities is tracked by the SLT member responsible for Pupil Premium. |
| Improve overall attendance and punctuality for disadvantaged students. | Overall attendance for disadvantaged students is in line with the whole school target of 96%. The SLT member responsible for Pupil Premium liaises with the Attendance Lead and Attendance Officer for monitoring. |
Below are the details of how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above:
Teaching (for example CPD, recruitment and retention)Budgeted cost: £28,800 | ||
| Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
| Dedicated CPD T&L programme aligns with our ‘7 Key Features’ (7KF) of high-impact teaching strategies and is mapped for all teaching staff throughout the year. | This year’s SIP focus of ‘Pedagogy fosters All Round Excellence in the classroom’ focuses on challenge and is part of a three-year programme providing staff with a wide range of pedagogical strategies: ‘challenge underpins the curriculum’ and ‘Teachers have a broad toolkit of pedagogical strategies’. Collective Teacher Efficacy (CTE) according to John Hattie - VISIBLE LEARNING | 1 |
| Leaders monitoring teaching and learning strategies through 7KF learning walks and the T&L programme to inform bespoke CPD and follow up. | High-quality teaching, professional development of teachers and retention of staff all support the attainment of all students. QA processes ensure that disadvantaged students are a focus area throughout the year. | 1 |
| To recruit and retain well qualified, subject specialist staff. | Teachers Matter - RAND | 1 |
Targeted academic support (for example tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)Budgeted cost: £20,650 | ||
| Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
| Heads of Year monitor disadvantaged progress against non-disadvantaged progress, identifying issues with individuals and acting upon this information with individual support, structured interventions and tutoring if required – in-house or from an external provider. | Tuition targeted at specific needs and knowledge gaps can be an effective method to support students, both one-to-one: One to one tuition | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) and in small groups: | 1,2,3,4 and 5 |
| Disadvantaged students are prioritised to attend targeted intervention in CORE and non-CORE subjects. | 1,2,3 and 4 | |
| Study hall provides the opportunity to complete work, NEAs etc. using IT facilities | 4 | |
| Revision Guides and revision materials provided to disadvantaged students; access to online platforms e.g. UpLearn | High-impact, low-cost, extensive evidence | 4 |
Wider strategies (for example related to attendance, behaviour, well-being)Budgeted cost: £49, 080 | ||
| Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
| Emotional Intelligence coach | Social and emotional interventions and behaviour interventions showing high impact | 2 |
| Counselling and other well-being services | As above | 2 |
| Careers support to ensure disadvantaged students get high-quality careers advice in line with the Gatsby benchmarks. | High-quality careers guidance is vital to ensuring young people can access jobs that suit their talents and aspirations. This advice is particularly important for students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, as they are less likely to have access to a wide range of knowledge and guidance from family and friends, or to have networks that provide an insight into a range of career options. | 1,2 and 3 |
| To develop the links between the school, students and parents. This includes conversations to monitor attendance and assess progress as well as to discuss opportunities for the school to support with provision of school resources and to promote student engagement in educational trips and co-curricular activities. | Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) Teaching and Learning Toolkit identifies parental engagement as a key factor: | 2,3,4,5 |
| Educational trips and visits | Increases cultural capital and aspirations. EEF high-impact moderate cost | 3 and 4 |
Total budgeted cost: £28,800 + 20,650 + 49,080 = £98,530 | ||
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on students in the 2024–2025 academic year.
Disadvantaged students at TWGSB continue to make above-average progress against national standards, however the outcomes at both KS5 and KS4 remain slightly lower than the rest of the whole school cohort, with A8 measures lower at KS4 and the average point score at KS5 lower, although the average grade was the same at KS5. The average attainment 8 score nationally was 45.9, compared with 59.0 for our disadvantaged students and students achieving the EBacc A8 were significantly above the national average.
Of the GCSE cohort of disadvantaged students, half of them achieved an average grade in line with, or above, the average grade for the cohort. Three students achieved above the whole school cohort. This indicates that while the curriculum and interventions were successful in supporting the attainment of the cohort of disadvantaged students, there is still work to be done in further specific, targeted interventions to close learning gaps and reinforce of emotional well-being for this to increase. Of this cohort, all students were supported with careers advice and supporting next steps and they are all now accessing education or training post-16.
At KS5, disadvantaged students achieved the same average grade as the whole school cohort, a B-. Fifty per cent of the disadvantaged students achieved an average grade above, or in line with, the rest of the cohort, whereas the other fifty percent achieved a grade below. We continue to focus on targeted academic and pastoral support for those students. However, post-18, the destinations of our disadvantaged students shows that the careers and aspiration support meant they all accessed high-quality education, whether places at top universities or higher-level apprenticeships.
| PUPIL PREMIUM 2022-23 | 18th Dec 2023 | |
| PUPIL PREMIUM 2023-24 | 19th Dec 2024 | |
| PUPIL PREMIUM 2024-25 | 29th Jan 2026 | |
| Pupil Premium Funding: Policy and Guidelines | 1st Jul 2025 |